A Box Called "Tolerences"

Post pictures of your original, unique designs that you made. Come on! Show it off here!

Moderator: Michael

A Box Called "Tolerences"

Postby flairwoodworks » Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:16 am


This box was built from rough butternut using only hand tools. I started with green boards of butternut and planed them down with a scrub and jack plane, cut the half-lap joints with a chisel and skew-rabbet plane, and glued and nailed the joints. I glued and nailed on the bottom with two nails - the other two nails were docked and only serve to keep the box from rocking. Everything was laid out using my eye and a carpenter's pencil. No tape measure, no ruler, no square, no marking knife.

Carving the four sides took about five hours total. The ends each took about 8 minutes to layout and carve, the back about 12 minutes. Yes, the relief carving on the front took a lot of work. This simple box started out as a simple, fun project but escalated to a much more involved and meaningful one.

Tolerances have been at the forefront of my mind for months. Nowadays in fine woodworking, it seems as if everyone strives for perfection. Boards must be four-squared (faces parallel to each other and edges square to the faces), joints have to be seamless, and everything has to be perfectly smooth. That is the result of tight tolerances. If tolerances are let slip and an edge is not straight, a joint does not fit well, or a surface is rough, it is easy to criticize the work.

But what if that edge was not meant to be straight? What if the joint was meant to be ill-fitting? Or the surface meant to be rough? If these characteristics were intended, then can it be argued that high tolerances have still been maintained and only the perceived result has changed? It is this question that I hope to answer with this box. Perhaps a better question is: "What is a flaw?" Is a flaw still a flaw if it was intended to be as it is?

Have a look at this box (yes, it's better to see it in person). The wood has very nice colouring to it and the carvings were done very nicely. In fact, the joke is that I did too good a job on the carving - there is not as much character in it as I would like. As you look closer, you begin to notice more.

There is one live edge along the front of the base. There are four live edges along the top edges of the box and none line up perfectly. Actually, one corner is out by over 1/8". Looking inside, you see that there is a long gap between the two boards which were glued up for width. And from the end, the corner of one bottom board is chipped. The chamfer around the edges is irregular, but clean. You set the box down and look at it again. Isn't "tolerence" spelled with an "a"?

Chris @ www.flairwoodworks.com
and www.flairwoodwork.spaces.live.com)
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 9:47 am

Postby Matt » Fri Aug 21, 2009 6:07 am

Your comments remind me very much of Japanese woodworking philosophy. They speak abut the imperfections giving the piece character and "soul."
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 4:47 pm

Postby John » Sat Aug 22, 2009 9:03 am


I really like your piece on numerous fronts.

First, the whimsy. Not easy to do well and not done enough!

Second, your piece evokes emotion--both good and bad (you either love it or hate it and I suspect most "woodworkers" will hate it)--the power to evoke emotion is the foundation of all art.

Third, you are obviously pushing yourself and seeking a unique voice which is an important step in breaking from your woodworking influences--congratulations!

Fourth, THANK YOU for sharing. Too many of us labor in obscurity without our work ever being subjected to critique--the single most important step one can make towards growth.

Our society is so stuck on techniques that form is almost an afterthought which is completely disgusting.

Come back and share again!


Site Admin
Posts: 187
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 11:54 am

Return to Original Designs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest